VERIFICATION
Report a discrepancy through a controlled review route.
Use this route when a document carrying the Ghazi and Co name appears inconsistent with its issue record or raises another authenticity concern. Describe the issue without deciding the outcome in advance. The initial request helps the issuing team assess the matter and identify any further information or authority required.
Tell us about the document
Supply the minimum useful detail
Include your name, reply email, report reference and the discrepancy observed. Useful examples are a different reporting period, an unexpected version or a status that does not match the copy supplied to you. Explain how you received the document where relevant, without disclosing unnecessary personal information about other people.
Preserve the material without widening access
Keep the original file and the message through which it was received. Do not edit the document to demonstrate the concern. Avoid posting it publicly or sending it to unrelated recipients. If a copy is needed for review, we will identify an approved transfer route and assess your authority to provide or receive the relevant information.
Understand the review outcome
The team may confirm an issue detail, identify a superseded version, request further evidence or explain a limit on what can be disclosed. A website acknowledgement does not establish fraud, provide a professional opinion or resolve a legal dispute. Any resulting correction or withdrawal must follow the authorised document-control process.
Common questions
Should we rely on the document while the concern is unresolved?
Consider the nature of your decision and obtain appropriate advice. The verification service cannot make a recipient's reliance or risk decision on their behalf.